<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Swag I Get</title>
	<link>http://mullentown.com/the-swag-i-get/</link>
	<description>Home of Heart, Mind and Really Big Issues</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: gabespop</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/the-swag-i-get/#comment-1700</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 22:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/the-swag-i-get/#comment-1700</guid>
					<description>Msteele,

No.  Those alternatives aren't morally equivalent.  You're absolutely right on this.  

I walk to work every day. Wonder if someone could send a few bucks my way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Msteele,</p>
<p>No.  Those alternatives aren&#8217;t morally equivalent.  You&#8217;re absolutely right on this.  </p>
<p>I walk to work every day. Wonder if someone could send a few bucks my way?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: baldyjoe</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/the-swag-i-get/#comment-1692</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 01:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/the-swag-i-get/#comment-1692</guid>
					<description>To msteele:  Thanks for your comment.  I also wonder why no one is talking aout this matter.  Your comparison to "indulgences" hit the nail on the head.  Cheerio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To msteele:  Thanks for your comment.  I also wonder why no one is talking aout this matter.  Your comparison to &#8220;indulgences&#8221; hit the nail on the head.  Cheerio
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: msteele</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/the-swag-i-get/#comment-1690</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 18:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/the-swag-i-get/#comment-1690</guid>
					<description>Speaking of marketing, please forgive me if I introduce a different topic here (I understand it's Holly's blog, but I have a burning question for my fellow Mullenistas.) 

I've been queasy about the marketing of carbon offsets, made only worse during the discussion of Mr. Gore's power usage in the Tennessee mansion, offset by his contributions to green power sources and tree planting, etc. I wasn't sure how to describe my unease until I glanced at an article by Alexander Cockburn in the Nation, where he discusses the religious fervor of global warming.

Now it's clear: carbon offsets = indulgences! Sin all you want, but pay us and we will intercede in your behalf and have those sins counterbalanced. Am I way off here? If you are concerned about global warming, you could trade your Expedition in for a Prius (or a bike), or you could keep driving the Expedition and pay someone to plant a bunch of trees for you. Are these two alternatives morally equivalent? Or just more of a way for people of money to feel good without really doing anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of marketing, please forgive me if I introduce a different topic here (I understand it&#8217;s Holly&#8217;s blog, but I have a burning question for my fellow Mullenistas.) </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been queasy about the marketing of carbon offsets, made only worse during the discussion of Mr. Gore&#8217;s power usage in the Tennessee mansion, offset by his contributions to green power sources and tree planting, etc. I wasn&#8217;t sure how to describe my unease until I glanced at an article by Alexander Cockburn in the Nation, where he discusses the religious fervor of global warming.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s clear: carbon offsets = indulgences! Sin all you want, but pay us and we will intercede in your behalf and have those sins counterbalanced. Am I way off here? If you are concerned about global warming, you could trade your Expedition in for a Prius (or a bike), or you could keep driving the Expedition and pay someone to plant a bunch of trees for you. Are these two alternatives morally equivalent? Or just more of a way for people of money to feel good without really doing anything?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: chardonnay</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/the-swag-i-get/#comment-1687</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 15:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/the-swag-i-get/#comment-1687</guid>
					<description>The film `Thank You For Smoking` comes to mind. A wicked,funny satire (though maybe not for people who have lost loved ones to the evil weed). Anyway,the Church has a large financial position in Altria..., can`t let sentiment get in the way of good investments.

Warner Woodworth has a good piece in the op/ed section of the SLTrib (on Veep).Unfortunately his candor will get him fired in the next purge.The BYU/LDS administration has a long and unforgiving memory of such heresy.I do admire his bravery.

Remember Ernest L. Wilkinson?  BYU had its very own Beria,complete with the personal sadism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The film `Thank You For Smoking` comes to mind. A wicked,funny satire (though maybe not for people who have lost loved ones to the evil weed). Anyway,the Church has a large financial position in Altria&#8230;, can`t let sentiment get in the way of good investments.</p>
<p>Warner Woodworth has a good piece in the op/ed section of the SLTrib (on Veep).Unfortunately his candor will get him fired in the next purge.The BYU/LDS administration has a long and unforgiving memory of such heresy.I do admire his bravery.</p>
<p>Remember Ernest L. Wilkinson?  BYU had its very own Beria,complete with the personal sadism.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
