<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving On</title>
	<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/</link>
	<description>Home of Heart, Mind and Really Big Issues</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: chardonnay</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-2087</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-2087</guid>
					<description>msteele,

Good point(s)...my original thought was in times of stress make the posts short. Like a show and tell of traveloges. I could weigh in with my vacations in Chad or Mali. More mellow than the angst of Utah politics or the horror of VP and W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>msteele,</p>
<p>Good point(s)&#8230;my original thought was in times of stress make the posts short. Like a show and tell of traveloges. I could weigh in with my vacations in Chad or Mali. More mellow than the angst of Utah politics or the horror of VP and W.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: msteele</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-2074</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-2074</guid>
					<description>Holly, you wrote "OK. Let's move on." The piece was about stark, but after more than two weeks, it seems you have faced the inevitable and moved on from mullentown to city weekly. I'd prefer you make a choice--keep up with your audience here, or sell the house and let us know we can visit you in the new one at slweekly.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly, you wrote &#8220;OK. Let&#8217;s move on.&#8221; The piece was about stark, but after more than two weeks, it seems you have faced the inevitable and moved on from mullentown to city weekly. I&#8217;d prefer you make a choice&#8211;keep up with your audience here, or sell the house and let us know we can visit you in the new one at slweekly.com.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mamapapaluv</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1879</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 18:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1879</guid>
					<description>Indeed, Holly, you should move on and if you can ignore the wiseguys. I love reading various blogs. I quickly learn those who know everything. They have opinions on everything, but can't seem to get anything right.

I don't like what ttstark has written on your blog. I'm assuming the writer is male. He's worth ignoring, shows little intelligence, has no idea what good or bad journalism is, probably spouts off elsewhere on the web. I say so what. Every walk of life has its ttstark. What they write lacks luster, sheds no knowledge, contributes nothing to the threads at hand, wants the spotlight shined on his stupidity.

The fellow seems to have his demons. Perhaps a war veteran; perhaps someone who has had a huge share of hard knocks. Who knows?

As a veteran journalist you've learned to take flack. From readers, editors, government and anyone else with soapbox in hand. You did superior work at the Tribune and you'll do equally well with the weekly. I'm not used to reading the weekly but will turn some atttention to it now that you're in charge. Your experience and background augur well for your success.

Keep a positive approach to your family and work. Accept the occasional blowhard's nonsense as just that. Your readers and fellow bloggers here respect you greatly. That, indeed, says something about Holly Mullen.

mamapapaluv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, Holly, you should move on and if you can ignore the wiseguys. I love reading various blogs. I quickly learn those who know everything. They have opinions on everything, but can&#8217;t seem to get anything right.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like what ttstark has written on your blog. I&#8217;m assuming the writer is male. He&#8217;s worth ignoring, shows little intelligence, has no idea what good or bad journalism is, probably spouts off elsewhere on the web. I say so what. Every walk of life has its ttstark. What they write lacks luster, sheds no knowledge, contributes nothing to the threads at hand, wants the spotlight shined on his stupidity.</p>
<p>The fellow seems to have his demons. Perhaps a war veteran; perhaps someone who has had a huge share of hard knocks. Who knows?</p>
<p>As a veteran journalist you&#8217;ve learned to take flack. From readers, editors, government and anyone else with soapbox in hand. You did superior work at the Tribune and you&#8217;ll do equally well with the weekly. I&#8217;m not used to reading the weekly but will turn some atttention to it now that you&#8217;re in charge. Your experience and background augur well for your success.</p>
<p>Keep a positive approach to your family and work. Accept the occasional blowhard&#8217;s nonsense as just that. Your readers and fellow bloggers here respect you greatly. That, indeed, says something about Holly Mullen.</p>
<p>mamapapaluv
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: twowheelfish</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1877</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1877</guid>
					<description>Hey Holly, 

How come Weekly doesn't take on the private club exclusion at the airport? How come a californian can fly into utah, get a gin and tonic without having to pay a private club fee (nor write down their name and address), and then fly off AS LONG AS THEY ONLY DRINK IN THE AIRPORT????  

I think Weekly should lead a campaign to get rid of this exculsion: damnit, you come to utah, you have to follow the same islamic drinking rules that everyone in the state has to follow. It isn't fair to have this exclusion.  And if this issue might embarrass the legislature enuf to get rid of the private club rules altogether in the state, so much the better. But this is an issue of fairness, and I am tired of being a second class citizen in my adopted state.

Whadda think??

Signed,

Lost in the Ozone Again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Holly, </p>
<p>How come Weekly doesn&#8217;t take on the private club exclusion at the airport? How come a californian can fly into utah, get a gin and tonic without having to pay a private club fee (nor write down their name and address), and then fly off AS LONG AS THEY ONLY DRINK IN THE AIRPORT????  </p>
<p>I think Weekly should lead a campaign to get rid of this exculsion: damnit, you come to utah, you have to follow the same islamic drinking rules that everyone in the state has to follow. It isn&#8217;t fair to have this exclusion.  And if this issue might embarrass the legislature enuf to get rid of the private club rules altogether in the state, so much the better. But this is an issue of fairness, and I am tired of being a second class citizen in my adopted state.</p>
<p>Whadda think??</p>
<p>Signed,</p>
<p>Lost in the Ozone Again
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lostinutah</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1870</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 06:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1870</guid>
					<description>msteele, God knows I've had my shifts in 40 years.  But - I'm still secure in my views, the difference I have is that I still don't feel the need to force my points of view onto others as law.  That, (not perhaps in your case of course is something that happens frequently in Utah - "my" (majority) point of view is rammed down throats of those of thus that just aren't there with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>msteele, God knows I&#8217;ve had my shifts in 40 years.  But - I&#8217;m still secure in my views, the difference I have is that I still don&#8217;t feel the need to force my points of view onto others as law.  That, (not perhaps in your case of course is something that happens frequently in Utah - &#8220;my&#8221; (majority) point of view is rammed down throats of those of thus that just aren&#8217;t there with it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lostinutah</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1869</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 06:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1869</guid>
					<description>Nic, to me they are the same.  :)  Glad to see someone else is on the watch!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nic, to me they are the same.  :)  Glad to see someone else is on the watch!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: msteele</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1868</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1868</guid>
					<description>Your column was excellent, Holly. Romney's proven that he's a competent leader, but his changes, charmed life, and Mormonism are issue.

There is one thing to point out about Romney's changes in position on abortion law, gay rights, and embryonic stem cell research--they all occurred after he took office. I believe it's plausible that his changes derived from having to confront the reality of the issues for the first time as an elected official, like when he reviewed the cloning request from Harvard.

I know I've had many times where I thought I knew how I felt about an issue, but then a life circumstance made me face the issue squarely and make a decision. Sometimes I ended up feeling the same way, but stronger, but other times I changed how I felt, based on the 'further review'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your column was excellent, Holly. Romney&#8217;s proven that he&#8217;s a competent leader, but his changes, charmed life, and Mormonism are issue.</p>
<p>There is one thing to point out about Romney&#8217;s changes in position on abortion law, gay rights, and embryonic stem cell research&#8211;they all occurred after he took office. I believe it&#8217;s plausible that his changes derived from having to confront the reality of the issues for the first time as an elected official, like when he reviewed the cloning request from Harvard.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;ve had many times where I thought I knew how I felt about an issue, but then a life circumstance made me face the issue squarely and make a decision. Sometimes I ended up feeling the same way, but stronger, but other times I changed how I felt, based on the &#8216;further review&#8217;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nic</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1867</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 11:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1867</guid>
					<description>lostinutah, you're being MUCH too kind in saying Willard looks like a used car salesman. What I see is a snake oil salesman. 
And speaking of a Willard watch, check out this blog http://mormonsagainstromney.blogspot.com/
These kids are on it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lostinutah, you&#8217;re being MUCH too kind in saying Willard looks like a used car salesman. What I see is a snake oil salesman.<br />
And speaking of a Willard watch, check out this blog <a href="http://mormonsagainstromney.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mormonsagainstromney.blogspot.com/</a><br />
These kids are on it!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lostinutah</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1866</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 22:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1866</guid>
					<description>Unlike many "Utahns" (after a year, can call I call myself one?), I am so DARNED tired of the Mitt Romney story.  JFK had defend the fact he could be a good president and a Catholic and Romney is probably going to have do some of the same.  He should be able to do so quite nicely, JFK's argument still stands up, though there are things in place now (Roe v. Wade) that might have made it harder for Kennedy.

The problem I have is, I can't stand the man's waffling and he looks like a used car salesman.  And, though I still read the Trib and like it for the most part I wish they would GET OVER MITT. No offense, Holly, I think once in a while a well placed story or column is fine.  But Utah's media doesn't have to be on a "Mitt Romney Watch" for heaven's sake. 

Whew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike many &#8220;Utahns&#8221; (after a year, can call I call myself one?), I am so DARNED tired of the Mitt Romney story.  JFK had defend the fact he could be a good president and a Catholic and Romney is probably going to have do some of the same.  He should be able to do so quite nicely, JFK&#8217;s argument still stands up, though there are things in place now (Roe v. Wade) that might have made it harder for Kennedy.</p>
<p>The problem I have is, I can&#8217;t stand the man&#8217;s waffling and he looks like a used car salesman.  And, though I still read the Trib and like it for the most part I wish they would GET OVER MITT. No offense, Holly, I think once in a while a well placed story or column is fine.  But Utah&#8217;s media doesn&#8217;t have to be on a &#8220;Mitt Romney Watch&#8221; for heaven&#8217;s sake. </p>
<p>Whew.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gabespop</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1865</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 21:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/moving-on/#comment-1865</guid>
					<description>Chardonnay, 

 I didn't know Jackson did that!  If so, forget what I said and screw him:-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chardonnay, </p>
<p> I didn&#8217;t know Jackson did that!  If so, forget what I said and screw him:-).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
