<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate Frenzy</title>
	<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/</link>
	<description>Home of Heart, Mind and Really Big Issues</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: chardonnay</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1744</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1744</guid>
					<description>gabespop,

San Francisco is very diverse and exhibitionist..don`t like the Lavenders ? We also have the Harvey Milk dems and the "Commie Queers" (no,I`m not making this up). Maybe wouldn`t play well in Logan.

Cheers !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gabespop,</p>
<p>San Francisco is very diverse and exhibitionist..don`t like the Lavenders ? We also have the Harvey Milk dems and the &#8220;Commie Queers&#8221; (no,I`m not making this up). Maybe wouldn`t play well in Logan.</p>
<p>Cheers !
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gabespop</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1741</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1741</guid>
					<description>Msteele,

  There's a non-zero probability that the Rocky supporters were drunk off their asses.  That'd explain their uncharacteristic rowdiness.

Chardonnay,

  With a name like "Lavender Left," you'd have to have balls (metaphorically, anyway. I imagine many of the members actually have had them surgically removed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Msteele,</p>
<p>  There&#8217;s a non-zero probability that the Rocky supporters were drunk off their asses.  That&#8217;d explain their uncharacteristic rowdiness.</p>
<p>Chardonnay,</p>
<p>  With a name like &#8220;Lavender Left,&#8221; you&#8217;d have to have balls (metaphorically, anyway. I imagine many of the members actually have had them surgically removed).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: msteele</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1722</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 18:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1722</guid>
					<description>gabespop,

I could be wrong about who was more boisterous, since I was just listening on the radio, but it seemed to me that although both 'debaters' had heckling going on, the voices were louder and the interruptions more frequent during Hannity's speech. 

And chardonnay, so is that where the phrase 'two left effete' comes from? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gabespop,</p>
<p>I could be wrong about who was more boisterous, since I was just listening on the radio, but it seemed to me that although both &#8216;debaters&#8217; had heckling going on, the voices were louder and the interruptions more frequent during Hannity&#8217;s speech. </p>
<p>And chardonnay, so is that where the phrase &#8216;two left effete&#8217; comes from? ;-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: chardonnay</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1721</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 17:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1721</guid>
					<description>Here in San Francisco we have many liberal political groups, my favorite is the Lavender Left. Platitudinous ? yes, effete ? yes....but weenies ? no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in San Francisco we have many liberal political groups, my favorite is the Lavender Left. Platitudinous ? yes, effete ? yes&#8230;.but weenies ? no.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gabespop</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1719</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1719</guid>
					<description>Oops! Liberals are "weenies," not weenines:-) (and I left a comma and a word out of the sentence before that, I think).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! Liberals are &#8220;weenies,&#8221; not weenines:-) (and I left a comma and a word out of the sentence before that, I think).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gabespop</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1718</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1718</guid>
					<description>Msteele,

  I didn't see it but everything that I've heard about it is consistent with your observations.

  However, were you sure it was just the college liberals who were antipathetic towards free speech?  Something tells me that the Hannity supporters were just, if not more boisterous than the alleged "college liberals."

 Actually, college liberals tend to be sedate-to-the-point-of-being-comatose-NPR-listen' weenines.  The few testosterone juiced 21 year-olds you see on TV are unrepresentative of the general population of timorous pansies from which liberals tend to be spawned.  I personally am too much of a coward to attend those sorts of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Msteele,</p>
<p>  I didn&#8217;t see it but everything that I&#8217;ve heard about it is consistent with your observations.</p>
<p>  However, were you sure it was just the college liberals who were antipathetic towards free speech?  Something tells me that the Hannity supporters were just, if not more boisterous than the alleged &#8220;college liberals.&#8221;</p>
<p> Actually, college liberals tend to be sedate-to-the-point-of-being-comatose-NPR-listen&#8217; weenines.  The few testosterone juiced 21 year-olds you see on TV are unrepresentative of the general population of timorous pansies from which liberals tend to be spawned.  I personally am too much of a coward to attend those sorts of things.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: msteele</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1715</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 12:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1715</guid>
					<description>Anyone else see it? I listened in, and I thought Anderson in his initial presentation was much more detailed and meaty than Hannity. Sean went for emotion with limited substance and lots of emotion, Rocky generally kept calm and factual, except for when he compared Pres. Bush to the Nazi war criminals tried at Nuremburg. But the candidate and audience Q&#38;A's were fluff and posturing, leaving me with a 'pox on both your houses' feeling. And the audience seemed overly boisterous, showing college liberals' typical antipathy toward free speech (though Hannity seemed to enjoy playing to that).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else see it? I listened in, and I thought Anderson in his initial presentation was much more detailed and meaty than Hannity. Sean went for emotion with limited substance and lots of emotion, Rocky generally kept calm and factual, except for when he compared Pres. Bush to the Nazi war criminals tried at Nuremburg. But the candidate and audience Q&amp;A&#8217;s were fluff and posturing, leaving me with a &#8216;pox on both your houses&#8217; feeling. And the audience seemed overly boisterous, showing college liberals&#8217; typical antipathy toward free speech (though Hannity seemed to enjoy playing to that).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: twowheelfish</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1709</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 15:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1709</guid>
					<description>Too bad no one asked Hannity if he did not believe in evolution like they did the repub candidates for prez the other nite (three raised their hands that they did not) otherwise we could have gotten a more solid grounding of Hannity's intellect (of lack thereof).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad no one asked Hannity if he did not believe in evolution like they did the repub candidates for prez the other nite (three raised their hands that they did not) otherwise we could have gotten a more solid grounding of Hannity&#8217;s intellect (of lack thereof).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: msteele</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1703</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 20:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1703</guid>
					<description>I think you're all right. I'd like someone competent to engage the Mayor in a real discussion, but I think Hannity relies too much on his ability to cut off or override callers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re all right. I&#8217;d like someone competent to engage the Mayor in a real discussion, but I think Hannity relies too much on his ability to cut off or override callers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nic</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1702</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 11:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/debate-frenzy/#comment-1702</guid>
					<description>Me thinks Mayor Rocky will kick a$$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me thinks Mayor Rocky will kick a$$.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
