<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Jim, Very Bad</title>
	<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/</link>
	<description>Home of Heart, Mind and Really Big Issues</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 02:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: msteele</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1688</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 16:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1688</guid>
					<description>"Our Blue Dog Rep. is old enough to remember Vietnam. Americans learned something from that protracted and ugly mess. They haven’t forgotten. I think they’re telling people like Matheson that Iraq is looking like a shocking sequel."

While doing some research the other day I was looking at some newspapers from 1965, and there was a quote from McNamara, the Sec. of Defense: The US is no longer losing the war. Sounds all too familiar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our Blue Dog Rep. is old enough to remember Vietnam. Americans learned something from that protracted and ugly mess. They haven’t forgotten. I think they’re telling people like Matheson that Iraq is looking like a shocking sequel.&#8221;</p>
<p>While doing some research the other day I was looking at some newspapers from 1965, and there was a quote from McNamara, the Sec. of Defense: The US is no longer losing the war. Sounds all too familiar.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: greenjenni</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1679</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1679</guid>
					<description>I totally gave up on Jim when he voted for the Military and Commissions Act of 2006 -- that thing that strips us of habeas corpus if we are ever deemed enemy combatants, which could mean any U.S. citizen that opposes Bu$hCo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally gave up on Jim when he voted for the Military and Commissions Act of 2006 &#8212; that thing that strips us of habeas corpus if we are ever deemed enemy combatants, which could mean any U.S. citizen that opposes Bu$hCo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Emily</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1573</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1573</guid>
					<description>I agree with Todd.  Jim has *always* said he would oppose any "time certain language" ... so his vote came as no surprise to me, and therefore I didn't have to come unglued over it.

I understand his voting because I do live in his district... the southern Utah part of his district... and I'm here to tell you, the people who live in these Southern Utah Counties are just getting used to the idea of a Democrat.  I think he treads very carefully on his votes because the majority of people down here still support the war and think that George Bush is a good man, inspired by God.  I don't think that the vast majority of Utah liberals really *get* what we deal with down here in very bright red Southern Utah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Todd.  Jim has *always* said he would oppose any &#8220;time certain language&#8221; &#8230; so his vote came as no surprise to me, and therefore I didn&#8217;t have to come unglued over it.</p>
<p>I understand his voting because I do live in his district&#8230; the southern Utah part of his district&#8230; and I&#8217;m here to tell you, the people who live in these Southern Utah Counties are just getting used to the idea of a Democrat.  I think he treads very carefully on his votes because the majority of people down here still support the war and think that George Bush is a good man, inspired by God.  I don&#8217;t think that the vast majority of Utah liberals really *get* what we deal with down here in very bright red Southern Utah.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lostinutah</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1557</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1557</guid>
					<description>I was actually kind of excited to move to a state that had a Democratic rep - and I actually live in his district.  Then...I found he was not Democratic at all.  I think he must have said he was just to get to run against whoever he wanted to replace.  I will have to ask my native Utahan friend to see if that is so.  He is so not even close to being a Democrat as far as I can see.  However, occasionally he makes sense, so I guess he beats the alternative.  In the year I've lived here, I think he's gone "against the grain" once.  Maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually kind of excited to move to a state that had a Democratic rep - and I actually live in his district.  Then&#8230;I found he was not Democratic at all.  I think he must have said he was just to get to run against whoever he wanted to replace.  I will have to ask my native Utahan friend to see if that is so.  He is so not even close to being a Democrat as far as I can see.  However, occasionally he makes sense, so I guess he beats the alternative.  In the year I&#8217;ve lived here, I think he&#8217;s gone &#8220;against the grain&#8221; once.  Maybe.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: msteele</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1556</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1556</guid>
					<description>Anne,

You make some reasonable points, but I think it's still true that he voted the way he sees things, and other reasonable, thinking people have deep misgivings about the wisdom of setting a timetable. Todd was much more effective in expressing why he supports Matheson--I wish I'd let him go first. Although I'm a Republican, I support Matheson for many of the same reasons as Todd. 

I can see from this discussion why moderates have difficulty getting re-elected: never pure enough for the base of their own party, never quite good enough for the base of the other party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne,</p>
<p>You make some reasonable points, but I think it&#8217;s still true that he voted the way he sees things, and other reasonable, thinking people have deep misgivings about the wisdom of setting a timetable. Todd was much more effective in expressing why he supports Matheson&#8211;I wish I&#8217;d let him go first. Although I&#8217;m a Republican, I support Matheson for many of the same reasons as Todd. </p>
<p>I can see from this discussion why moderates have difficulty getting re-elected: never pure enough for the base of their own party, never quite good enough for the base of the other party.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Todd</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1552</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1552</guid>
					<description>Matheson has been tough on the war. He called on Rumsfeld to resign. He voted against the surge. And, he was consistent throughout his campaign in saying that he would not support a specific deadline for withdrawal of the troops.

Jim Matheson is a Democrat, an independent thinker, an advocate for Utah and his constituents, and a man who can be trusted to keep his word.

As a Democrat, I am proud to support Jim Matheson and thank him for actually doing what he said he would do -- even if I disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matheson has been tough on the war. He called on Rumsfeld to resign. He voted against the surge. And, he was consistent throughout his campaign in saying that he would not support a specific deadline for withdrawal of the troops.</p>
<p>Jim Matheson is a Democrat, an independent thinker, an advocate for Utah and his constituents, and a man who can be trusted to keep his word.</p>
<p>As a Democrat, I am proud to support Jim Matheson and thank him for actually doing what he said he would do &#8212; even if I disagree.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anne White</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1549</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1549</guid>
					<description>I would not want to read Sen. Lieberman's "preaching." I've had too much of preaching. The Washington Post and the New York Times both bought into the conspiracy to decept us, by the way. The Times has since seen the error of its ways and no longer supports the war. Don't know about the Post, because I don't read that paper.

As for Matheson not wanting to reflect a "left-wing mentality," he should be able to reflect a view of the reality of a war that was misconceived and has gone downhill from there. If someone in Congress just votes all the time in agreement with the majority party from his state, does he even have his own brain? And if a Republican like Chuck Hagel can reflect a "left-wing mentality," then Matheson as a Democrat should have the guts to do so, too. Up until recently, the Democrats have shown an absence of guts altogether. 

After all, even in bright red Utah a majority of people no longer support the war.

Finally, msteele, this is not about misreading "feelings," it is about not getting all fuzzy in the feelings department, talking vaguely about "core values" and forgetting that foreign policy should be based on cold, hard facts. 

A U.S. Congressman, no matter whom, should represent doing the right thing based on correct information readily available to him and his staff as you say, "regardless of party affiliation."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not want to read Sen. Lieberman&#8217;s &#8220;preaching.&#8221; I&#8217;ve had too much of preaching. The Washington Post and the New York Times both bought into the conspiracy to decept us, by the way. The Times has since seen the error of its ways and no longer supports the war. Don&#8217;t know about the Post, because I don&#8217;t read that paper.</p>
<p>As for Matheson not wanting to reflect a &#8220;left-wing mentality,&#8221; he should be able to reflect a view of the reality of a war that was misconceived and has gone downhill from there. If someone in Congress just votes all the time in agreement with the majority party from his state, does he even have his own brain? And if a Republican like Chuck Hagel can reflect a &#8220;left-wing mentality,&#8221; then Matheson as a Democrat should have the guts to do so, too. Up until recently, the Democrats have shown an absence of guts altogether. </p>
<p>After all, even in bright red Utah a majority of people no longer support the war.</p>
<p>Finally, msteele, this is not about misreading &#8220;feelings,&#8221; it is about not getting all fuzzy in the feelings department, talking vaguely about &#8220;core values&#8221; and forgetting that foreign policy should be based on cold, hard facts. </p>
<p>A U.S. Congressman, no matter whom, should represent doing the right thing based on correct information readily available to him and his staff as you say, &#8220;regardless of party affiliation.&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: msteele</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1547</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1547</guid>
					<description>He could easily be voting what he truly believes, and believing what Sen. Lieberman is preaching (see the Senator's op-ed in today's Washington Post) about the need to persevere for victory in Iraq, and why he thinks that's still possible.

I'm sure Matheson also clearly understands that he is a Democrat elected from a Republican-majority district, and that his votes on key issues must not reflect a left-wing mentality. You all could be extremely right that he has misread feelings about the war, even in Utah, but I think generally he has reflected his core values in his votes, and his core values have resonated with his constituents, regardless of party affiliation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He could easily be voting what he truly believes, and believing what Sen. Lieberman is preaching (see the Senator&#8217;s op-ed in today&#8217;s Washington Post) about the need to persevere for victory in Iraq, and why he thinks that&#8217;s still possible.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Matheson also clearly understands that he is a Democrat elected from a Republican-majority district, and that his votes on key issues must not reflect a left-wing mentality. You all could be extremely right that he has misread feelings about the war, even in Utah, but I think generally he has reflected his core values in his votes, and his core values have resonated with his constituents, regardless of party affiliation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anne White</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1546</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1546</guid>
					<description>If you did not see the Bill Moyers special, "Selling the War," last night and don't see it repeated - BUY THE DVD. I put up with ads on TV and radio and claim they never make me buy anything, but here is proof that they work.

The Bush administration, with exaggeration, deception, and outright lies sold the necessity of the war to Congress, the press, the American people, and even to Great Britain. This has to be the greatest triumph ever of Madison Avenue.

Those in the media who asked questions and got readily available answers that proved the madness of going forward were marginalized, shunned, and had their patriotism questioned over and over.

One of the chief archtects of this blitz of misinformation, the face of evil incarnate, Vice President Cheney, is speaking today at BYU to "inspire" graduates there. I have never been so ashamed of my church as I am this day, but I am also ashamed of the American public, the press, and people like Matheson, who still think this is a war to be won. It should never have begun, so we must get out of there now, as Muslims all over the Middle East want us to do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you did not see the Bill Moyers special, &#8220;Selling the War,&#8221; last night and don&#8217;t see it repeated - BUY THE DVD. I put up with ads on TV and radio and claim they never make me buy anything, but here is proof that they work.</p>
<p>The Bush administration, with exaggeration, deception, and outright lies sold the necessity of the war to Congress, the press, the American people, and even to Great Britain. This has to be the greatest triumph ever of Madison Avenue.</p>
<p>Those in the media who asked questions and got readily available answers that proved the madness of going forward were marginalized, shunned, and had their patriotism questioned over and over.</p>
<p>One of the chief archtects of this blitz of misinformation, the face of evil incarnate, Vice President Cheney, is speaking today at BYU to &#8220;inspire&#8221; graduates there. I have never been so ashamed of my church as I am this day, but I am also ashamed of the American public, the press, and people like Matheson, who still think this is a war to be won. It should never have begun, so we must get out of there now, as Muslims all over the Middle East want us to do!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: rmwarnick</title>
		<link>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1544</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mullentown.com/bad-jim-very-bad/#comment-1544</guid>
					<description>Like many right-wingers, Jim Matheson has never served in the military.  I don't think he understands what's happening.  By June, the US Army will be fully committed in Iraq.  That means, not capable of doing anything else.  We have no strategic reserve, and only one brigade watching the DMZ in Korea.  This is beyond irresponsible.

President Bush still has no plan for successfully occupying Iraq, much less reconstructing their political system and economy.  The forces we are deploying are not enough to secure a country of 25 million, but more than we can afford to send.  

General Petraeus is improvising, and so far has only promised us more American casualties.  Iraqi civilian deaths are mounting month by month as we increase the level of violence in Baghdad.  The fourth anniversary of "mission accomplished" is on Tuesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many right-wingers, Jim Matheson has never served in the military.  I don&#8217;t think he understands what&#8217;s happening.  By June, the US Army will be fully committed in Iraq.  That means, not capable of doing anything else.  We have no strategic reserve, and only one brigade watching the DMZ in Korea.  This is beyond irresponsible.</p>
<p>President Bush still has no plan for successfully occupying Iraq, much less reconstructing their political system and economy.  The forces we are deploying are not enough to secure a country of 25 million, but more than we can afford to send.  </p>
<p>General Petraeus is improvising, and so far has only promised us more American casualties.  Iraqi civilian deaths are mounting month by month as we increase the level of violence in Baghdad.  The fourth anniversary of &#8220;mission accomplished&#8221; is on Tuesday.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
